The phrase “including but not limited to” is commonly used in legal, business, and formal writing to indicate a non-exhaustive list. However, there are several alternative expressions that convey the same meaning with varying degrees of formality and tone.

Common Alternatives
- Such as
- For example
- Among others
- Not limited to
- Including, without limitation
- Examples include
- As well as
- Inter alia (commonly used in legal contexts)
Formal Variants
In more formal or contractual settings, clarity and precision are crucial. Here are refined alternatives:
- Including, but without limitation
- Comprising, without being limited to
- Consisting of, without limitation
- Among other things
- Including, though not exclusively
Conversational Alternatives
In everyday or less formal writing, simpler phrases can be used:
- Like
- Such as
- For instance
- Among others
Usage Examples in Sentences
| Phrase | Example Sentence |
|---|---|
| Including but not limited to | This policy covers damages including but not limited to fire, flood, and theft. |
| Such as | The course covers various topics such as economics, history, and literature. |
| Among others | The award-winning team includes writers, editors, and designers, among others. |
| Including, without limitation | You are granted access to all materials, including, without limitation, audio, video, and text formats. |
| Inter alia | The defendant was charged with, inter alia, fraud and embezzlement. |
Conclusion
While “including but not limited to” is a widely accepted phrase, various alternatives offer flexibility in tone, clarity, and formality. Choose the version that best suits your context—whether you’re drafting legal documentation or crafting conversational content.
FAQ
Is it okay to use “such as” instead of “including but not limited to”?
Yes, “such as” can be used in informal or general writing, but it may not be specific enough in legal or contractual documents.
What does “inter alia” mean?
“Inter alia” is a Latin term meaning “among other things.” It is commonly used in legal texts to indicate a non-exhaustive list.
Is “including, without limitation” legally safer?
Yes, “including, without limitation” is often used in legal documents to emphasize that the list is not exhaustive and to prevent restrictive interpretation.

Leave a comment